Visit

In the fast-paced world of innovation and entrepreneurship, few roles are as pivotal as that of a coach. More than just mentors or advisors for startups, coaches can create connections across an industry, understand when a startup’s products are ready to launch and how to scale a company.

In her second academic year, Caroline Wharton, an Executive-in-Residence in Cornell Tech’s Runway Program, has played a crucial part in guiding startups from early stage ideas to developing business proposals and pitch decks. With a wealth of experience spanning corporate banking and startup leadership, Wharton has a unique perspective on what it takes to build a successful business in today’s challenging market.

We recently spoke with Wharton, who shared her insights on the resilience required for founders, the importance of adaptability, and how her role as a coach has evolved through her involvement with the Runway Program. From helping founders pivot to navigating tough funding landscapes, her wisdom offers invaluable guidance for aspiring entrepreneurs.

Cornell Tech: Can you tell us a bit about your professional background and what led you to coaching startups at Cornell Tech? How did you first get involved with the Runway Program?

Caroline Wharton: My background spans a mix of leadership roles in both corporate and startup environments, including my time at Wells Fargo and my own startup, Corraun Advisors. I’ve always been passionate about innovation, business development, and helping teams realize their full potential. Over time, I found that coaching startups allowed me to combine my experience with my desire to give back, and I truly enjoy guiding founders through the challenges of entrepreneurship.

My journey with Cornell Tech began from a passion for working with startups and emerging technologies. I had been mentoring entrepreneurs for a while, and when I learned about the Runway Program, I was immediately drawn to its unique focus on deep science-based startups. Joining as a coach felt like a natural next step, giving me the chance to work closely with talented, driven individuals who are transforming industries. It’s been incredibly rewarding to be part of this community, where I can stay close to cutting-edge technologies while also mentoring the next generation of innovators.

How do you help founders navigate the challenges of market discovery, and what role does the Runway cohort play in managing these challenges?

Navigating market discovery and pivoting is one of the hardest parts of entrepreneurship. It’s crucial to have peers or advisors, including the Runway team, to help founders stay objective. When feedback shows that their initial market discovery isn’t working, founders need to quickly evaluate other potential avenues. It’s about speed—if option A isn’t viable, they must either substantiate option B quickly or move to option C. This process can be tough, and for many, it feels like a grieving process when an idea doesn’t work out. But that’s where resilience and determination come in. Founders need to ride these waves and keep going.

The Runway cohort plays a vital role in this. As founders talk to their peers, they realize their struggles are not unique. There’s comfort in knowing that what they’re going through is the norm, not the exception. Some founders even find inspiration from one another, learning from shared experiences and building a supportive network that helps them manage these challenges.

What makes the New York City startup culture unique?

I spent some time on the West Coast for business and what I found is that the New York City ecosystem is so different and so healthy when compared to other cities. Everyone is so good at what they do, and I see people trying to help one another with the belief that a rising tide lifts all boats. Something that stands out to me is how willing those who have “been there and done that” are in providing constructive feedback and offering great networking advice. I really feel like New York is a city that is trying to move the needle in a positive direction when it comes to startups.

How has your experience as a coach influenced your own professional life, and what changes have you seen in the founders over time?

I’m naturally curious, and I love hearing about the ideas and businesses our cohort members are working on, especially those with a deep science base. It’s inspiring to see how they solve problems, and I often take those lessons back into my own work. Being a coach is not a one-way street—I learn from these founders’ resilience, dedication, and ability to continuously improve.

Over time, I’ve seen founders undergo significant transformations. The first year can be overwhelming, learning how to build a business, pitch to investors, develop products and manage financials all at once. It’s like drinking from a fire hose. By the second year, they’ve developed a level of resilience and strategic focus. Many are still pivoting, but they’re more grounded in their approach, with a clearer understanding of how to navigate a tough funding environment and target the right investors or grants.

What impact has the current funding environment had on startups in the program, and have there been any particularly inspiring projects?

The current funding environment has been challenging for many founders. Traditional VC funding is tougher to come by, which has pushed startups to explore alternative routes, such as grants or specialized investors who understand their scientific background. It’s about being strategic—founders often feel like investors are waiting with open checkbooks, but that’s rarely the case. The successful ones stay committed and figure out the right pathways for their business, often through more niche funding avenues.

One of the most inspiring projects from the program is Nanit, a baby monitor company that’s even used by the Kardashians. Another standout is Project B, which is developing customized bras using 3D printing technology. They’ve been gaining traction and tackling supply chain challenges, which has been incredible to watch. Seeing startups like these grow has been a real privilege, and I’m excited to see where they go from here.

What excites you most about working with the Cornell Tech Runway cohort?
I’m regularly blown away by the ideas these founders bring to the table. Whether it’s in healthcare or another field, it’s exciting to witness their growth from concept to market. Some of their solutions have the potential to be truly transformative, and watching them progress, knowing that one day they could reach the same level of success as past graduates, is incredibly rewarding.


New Report Quantifies Cornell Tech’s Role in Attracting Talent to New York City and Growing the City’s Tech Sector

Since its founding in 2012, Cornell Tech has played a crucial role in developing New York City’s tech talent, entrepreneurship, job creation, and fiscal prosperity. From launching more than 100 startups and educating thousands of new tech leaders to operating an 850,000-square-foot campus while planning future expansion, the energy coming out of the regional tech hub is undeniable. But what is its overall economic impact? A new analysis from economic development firm HR&A puts it into numbers – and they are massive.

In fiscal year 2022-2023, Cornell Tech, its alumni, and its startups based in New York City achieved $768 million in total economic impact and supported 2,800 jobs. And by 2030, Cornell Tech’s alumni and startups based in New York City are projected to generate $1.5 billion in annual economic impact while supporting 7,000 jobs, living up to its reputation as the single most effective economic development project undertaken by city government in recent decades.

“New York City has been a consistent draw for ambitious and intelligent people from around the world. Cornell Tech has created a novel academic and entrepreneurial environment that brings new tech talent to the city who go on to become industry leaders and builders who are driving our city’s workforce and technology industry,” said Greg Morrisett, the Jack and Rilla Neafsey Dean and Vice Provost of Cornell Tech. “This report not only highlights the significant contributions that Cornell Tech has made to our local economy, but also emphasizes how our growing alumni network will lead innovation in emerging technology and artificial intelligence for years to come.”

HR&A’s analysis quantified the projected spending and economic impact generated by Cornell Tech, its alumni, and the startups they create, finding that “the campus operates educational and entrepreneurial programs that attract world-class talent who remain in New York City after graduation to work in high-paying industries while creating thousands of new jobs for tech workers that contribute to the city’s tech ecosystem.”

Cornell Tech’s startup programs have launched more than 115 companies. These startups have generated a collective valuation of more than $700 million while creating more than 500 new jobs in New York City, boosting the local economy and tech community. Some of the most notable startups include baby sleep monitor Nanit, real estate construction intelligence platform OnsiteIQ, and infectious disease diagnostic Biota. As of 2023, companies founded at Cornell Tech in the health sector generated $97 million for the city, making up almost 50% of the total economic output from Cornell Tech’s startups and helping New York City to surpass Silicon Valley as the leader in digital health startups. The share of Cornell Tech companies founded by women (32%) and the share of funds raised that go to women-founded companies (23.5%) outperforms national and city averages.

In addition to spending activity, the report outlines the revenue and construction jobs generated by the creation of the campus itself, with Cornell Tech’s construction to date and upcoming construction expected to generate $1.1 billion in labor income and $2.4 billion in economic output by 2030.

Cornell Tech was founded in 2012 when Cornell University and the Technion­–Israel Institute of Technology were selected by Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg to establish a campus after competing in the Applied Sciences NYC Competition, which sought to increase New York City’s capacity for applied sciences and dramatically transform the city’s economy.

Collaborating closely with the New York City Economic Development Corporation (NYCEDC) since its founding, Cornell Tech was first located in Google’s New York City offices on Eighth Avenue before moving to its state-of-the-art Roosevelt Island campus in 2017 and has retained its longstanding productive partnerships with both the city and NYCEDC in the years since.

“Cornell Tech has been a transformative force in growing New York City’s economy by integrating academia with industry and attracting international talent while fostering groundbreaking innovation, generating thousands of high-quality jobs, and contributing millions in economic output,” said New York City Economic Development Corporation (NYCEDC) President and CEO Andrew Kimball. “NYCEDC and the City of New York recognized early on that the creation of a world-class academic institution would be a cornerstone investment in our city’s future and would further catalyze the growth of the tech ecosystem. We look forward to building on this successful partnership to continue to drive long-term economic benefits and job creation through our shared goals and initiatives.”

The innovation ecosystem created by Cornell Tech has had the effect of not only drawing future tech leaders to New York City but also keeping them here. Carmem Leticia da Maia Silva, who came from Brazil to earn a master’s degree in Law, Technology, and Entrepreneurship at Cornell Tech, is just one of those success stories. Now, she negotiates major IT agreements, provides critical legal guidance, and ensures proper alignment with global corporate policies at McKinsey & Company – one of the world’s most esteemed and influential management consulting firms.

“I’ve always been interested in the interplay between law and tech, how statutes and regulations anticipate and respond to innovation. What drew me to Cornell Tech was the opportunity to closely collaborate with executives and decision makers from major companies,” said da Maia Silva. “At Cornell Tech, I was able to work side-by-side with entrepreneurs driving the tech industry forward and apply those learnings to my study of real-world legal issues.”

Da Maia Silva’s New York City success story is one of many connected to Cornell Tech. Her peers include Aish Ravindran, who came to New York City for the Johnson Cornell Tech MBA program from Los Angeles and became a product manager for New York-based Uber Health following graduation. Anirban Poddar, who came to Cornell Tech from India for a master’s in engineering, now works as a product manager at Amazon. Another is Arvin Khodayari, who brought his passion for judicial studies from Canada to pursue his master’s of law from Cornell Tech and now works in New York City as an associate at Ropes & Gray LLP. In all, 75% of the Cornell Tech students who move to New York City from elsewhere stay in the region. These alumni alone generated $390 million in annual economic output in fiscal year 2022-2023, which is projected to grow to $956 million by 2030.

“As a graduate student, it quickly became clear that staying in New York City after graduation was a must,” says da Maia Silva. “The tech and legal networks here are unrivaled when it comes to having an impact on a global scale – and Cornell Tech is at the center of it.”

The full report can be accessed here: https://tech.cornell.edu/impact/cornell-tech-impact-study/.


Cornell Tech today announced that longtime supporter and Cornell alumnus Frederic Rubinstein ’52, LLB ’55 has donated $1 million to the campus’ Public Interest Technology (PiTech) program to support research that helps to mitigate risks posed by artificial intelligence.

In recent years, corporations, governments, and nonprofits have adopted artificial intelligence processing to increase their efficiency. However, with an alarming rise of deepfake photos and videos emerging and algorithmic biases and imbalance, it’s clear that as AI and machine learning are incorporated into aspects of our everyday lives, the tech ecosystem must elevate public need and intentionally shape these new innovations with a focus on ethical implementation.

“Due to the lack of AI regulation, this technology has the potential to be an increasingly dangerous threat to democracy if it continues to be permitted to be misused,” said Frederic Rubinstein. “We need urgent and effective research to ensure that AI benefits society, rather than becoming a danger to it. Cornell Tech is uniquely qualified to address this problem, which is why I wanted to invest in the development of PiTech. Cornell Tech’s outstanding faculty and students are among the brightest and most effective in the world, and have already demonstrated a deep and serious commitment to building a more ethical tech sector. I am privileged to be associated with their efforts.”

The gift will establish the Frederic and Susan Rubinstein Impact Fellowship Fund, which will support the PiTech Initiative’s Ph.D. Impact Fellowship in sustaining up to five additional fellowships per year, and the Frederic and Susan Rubinstein Innovation Fund to support  projects and partnerships with significant long-term potential for serving public good.

Rubinstein’s generous new funding for PiTech comes at a time when New York City’s AI sector is rapidly growing, with the city ranking in terms of total venture capital funding for AI companies and third nationally in job listings for generative AI jobs.

A retired partner at law firm Kelley Drye & Warren, Rubinstein is recognized as a leader in corporate law representing both investors and entrepreneurs in the tech sector, and a noted philanthropist in the field. He has made previous donations to Cornell Tech including a $1 million gift to the campus in 2018 to establish the Frederic and Susan Rubinstein Fund for Social Benefit in Entrepreneurial Programs to provide loan-repayment assistance for graduates serving the public sector, reducing graduate students’ debts by a third. In addition, he has helped facilitate mentorship for new entrepreneurs by developing relationships between Cornell Tech Runway postdocs and legal experts at his firm.

Since its founding in 2021 by Robert V. Tishman Founder’s Chair and Associate Dean for Impact Deborah Estrin, Cornell Tech’s PiTech Initiative has been a leader in integrating hands-on public interest engagement into tech graduate education. The Rubinstein Ph.D. Impact Fellowships support students in tech and AI fields in working with NYC-based nonprofit and public sector organizations, allowing them to gain exposure to the tech challenges facing public interest organizations and contribute their skills and expertise. It is an expansion of the Siegel PiTech Ph.D. Impact Fellowship launched in 2021. The fellows have explored a variety of topics from whether and how specific social services organizations can safely use LLM-based chatbots and how tech-enabled vehicles manage consumers’ data to how custom devices can be developed with 3D printers to improve communication for patients with disabilities.

“We are deeply grateful to Mr. Rubinstein for allowing us to advance our leadership in public interest tech innovation,” said Cornell Tech Jack and Rilla Neafsey Dean and Vice Provost Greg Morrisett. “Public Interest Tech is an essential initiative on our campus for fostering social responsibility in AI worldwide, and is critical to Cornell Tech’s commitment to using research and entrepreneurial excellence to advance lasting economic and social prosperity. Mr. Rubinstein’s gift ensures that we can further examine the intersection of technology and ethical accountability to benefit communities and minimize risks.”

In addition to the Ph.D. Impact Fellowship, Cornell Tech also established The PiTech Impact Studio, which provides master’s students  with the opportunity to help public partners adopt and adapt emerging technologies, and a Visiting Practitioners (ViP) Program, which hosts practitioners from a range of impact-oriented organizations to advise students.

PiTech Initiative leader Estrin, a 2018 MacArthur Fellow, brings her own track record of tech innovation in the public interest to bear on her leadership of the program. Estrin is a pioneer in patient-centered digital health, and co-founded the non-profit startup Open mHealth, which promotes open innovation and standardization in the field.

“Mr. Rubinstein’s generous gift will allow us to meet students’ growing demand for meaningful public engagement, while enabling many more community partners to work with our talented technical students,” said Deborah Estrin, Associate Dean for Impact and Professor of Computer Science at Cornell Tech. “Since our founding, Cornell Tech has fostered collaboration to bring pressing societal needs to the forefront of emerging technology development. PiTech’s new Rubinstein Innovation Fund is a vital advancement of that work.”


Noor El-Hawwat’s journey into the tech industry began with a simple decision to follow in her sister’s footsteps and major in computer science. However, what started as a straightforward choice soon blossomed into a passion for tech, combined with a drive to uplift underrepresented minorities, set her on a path that would lead her to Cornell Tech—first through its Break Through Tech program and now as a master’s student in the Master of Engineering in Computer Science program.

Founded by former Verizon CIO Judith Spitz, Break Through Tech is a Cornell Tech initiative that aims to provide Black, LatinX, Native American, low-income women, and gender non-conforming individuals the technical skills training, professional readiness support, and real-world project experiences to break into influential tech roles.

Currently, women make up only 35% of the tech workforce in the US. Break Through Tech’s programming works to bridge the gap by helping women from underserved backgrounds secure tech internships and launch their careers. They excel on their paths toward the industry through the opportunity to partner with companies in the wider tech industry, with more than 7,000 women from nearly 300 universities across the country participating to date.

Break Through Tech played a pivotal role in El-Hawwat’s decision to pursue her master’s degree at Cornell Tech. Reflecting on her experience, she describes the program as “unlike any other,” emphasizing the unique opportunities it offered. “It really sparked this positivity and optimism in me to get into other extracurriculars and become my best self – as a leader and advocate for marginalized groups,” she shared.

For El-Hawwat, the program was more than just a stepping stone; it was a transformative experience that helped her build confidence and solidify her passion for tech. “When I met the Break Through Tech participants and leadership, I felt like Cornell Tech and the tech industry would be places where I could belong,” she said.

Originally from Cedar Grove, Noor El-Hawwat received her bachelor’s degree in Computer Science from Rutgers University-Newark. During her time in the Break Through Tech AI Program – a one-year extracurricular experience that equips undergraduate students with the skills needed to secure a job in the fastest-growing areas of tech, El-Hawwat participated in a machine learning foundations course, where she applied skills like data analysis and machine learning to tackle real-world challenges that pushed her to think creatively and collaborate closely with her peers.

As part of the program, El-Hawwat and her teammates were assigned a challenge project where they worked with industry-relevant tools and data-sets to identify the best location for a new coffee shop opening its first location in New York City. El-Hawwat and her team conducted extensive research on which factors made cafes in New York City successful, ultimately putting together a presentation that explored neighborhood datasets on everything from crime rate to budget and from access to transportation to foot traffic. El-Hawwat shared, “It was a very successful experience that brought out my best optimism to be an entrepreneur in the industry.”

El-Hawwat’s experience with the program also showed her how central the values of diversity, innovation, and entrepreneurship are to Cornell Tech’s mission. “As someone who wants to become an entrepreneur, the Break Through Tech program was something that stood out to me and made me eager to continue my journey with Cornell Tech,” she explained.

Her decision to pursue her master’s at Cornell Tech was inspired by a Zoom meeting she had during her time with Break Through Tech, where she had the opportunity to learn from current Cornell Tech students about their experiences. “I was really inspired by the thought of being in a space that embodied inspiring the next generation of entrepreneurs,” she said. “Cornell Tech is made up of diverse and innovative individuals who want to contribute to the next generation of AI, who mutually inspire each other to create and work toward changing the world, and who can develop new creations through access to Cornell Tech’s resources. It’s a community where what might seem like a crazy ambition elsewhere can actually come to life.”

Now, as a master’s student, El-Hawwat is thrilled about the future. She’s eager to continue learning, growing, and contributing to the AI revolution that the institution champions. She believes that the close-knit environment at Cornell Tech, combined with the mentorship from stellar practitioners, will help her become “a whole other individual… in a good way, someone that I never thought I could be otherwise.”

El-Hawwat’s story is a testament to the power of programs like Break Through Tech in shaping the next generation of leaders. Her journey from a high school student with a budding interest in computer science to a confident, driven master’s student at Cornell Tech illustrates the impact of providing opportunities and support for women and underserved communities in tech. “It’s through all these things in union that I do feel like I belong here and that this is where I should continue my experience and education.”


RELATED STORIES

By Patricia Waldron

Taking race into account when developing tools to predict a patient’s risk of colorectal cancer leads to more accurate predictions when compared with race-blind algorithms, researchers find.

While many medical researchers have argued that race should be removed as a factor from clinical algorithms that predict disease risks, a new study finds that, at least for colorectal cancer, including race can help correct a data issue – inaccurate recording of family history for Black patients.

Having relatives with colorectal cancer is a known risk factor for the disease, but Black patients are less likely to have an accurate recorded history in their medical records. Considering race can help correct for this, potentially identifying more Black patients who would benefit from cancer screening.

“If you don’t use race, what you’re effectively doing is you’re telling your algorithm, pretend that family history is equally useful for everyone, and that’s just not true in the data,” said Emma Pierson, senior author on the new study and the Andrew H. and Ann R. Tisch Assistant Professor of computer science at the Jacobs Technion-Cornell Institute at Cornell Tech and in the Cornell Ann S. Bowers College of Computing and Information Science.

She collaborated with Anna Zink of the University of Chicago and Ziad Obermeyer of the University of California, Berkeley on the new research, “Race Adjustments in Clinical Algorithms Can Help Correct For Racial Disparities In Data Quality,” which was published Aug. 13 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

To evaluate the impact of race on clinical algorithms for colorectal cancer, the researchers predicted the future risk of cancer for 77,836 racially and economically diverse participants in the Southern Community Cohort, a National Cancer Institute (NCI)-funded initiative aimed at understanding the causes of cancer and other major diseases. The participants, aged 40 to 74, had no medical history of colorectal cancer when they joined the cohort.

The research team developed a pair of algorithms for predicting colorectal cancer risk: one that included race, and another that did not. They used risk factors included in the NCI Colorectal Cancer Risk Assessment Tool, which considers a person’s age, weight, diet, exercise habits and family and medical history. Then they compared how well the two algorithms could predict colorectal cancer risk for Black and white participants.

The analysis showed that Black participants were more likely to report an unknown family history of cancer, suggesting this data might be less reliably recorded. Consistent with this finding, family history data was less helpful for predicting future cancer risk for Black participants.

Researchers found that the race-blind algorithms underpredicted cancer risk for Black participants and overpredicted the risk for white participants, while the race-adjusted algorithm more accurately predicted risk for each group. When the algorithm accounted for race, 74.4% of participants ranked in the half with the highest risk were Black, compared to 66.1% with the race-blind algorithm. When classified as high-risk, individuals may have better access to screening or other health care services.

There are important reasons to reconsider the use of race in medical algorithms, Pierson said. Many of these algorithms rely on outdated data, include false and biased beliefs about race or yield results that exacerbate health disparities. Some likely have led to Black patients being denied critical health care, such as kidney transplants, osteoporosis treatments or appropriate breast cancer screening.

The study by Pierson and her colleagues highlights the importance of comparing race-adjusted and race-blind algorithms before taking race out of the equation.

“A concern is that the removal of race might have unintended consequences, and we need to very carefully evaluate its impact,” Pierson said.

While tailoring algorithms with regard to race can sometimes lead to more accurate predictions by compensating for imperfect data, Pierson sees this as a stopgap measure.

“We need to design algorithms that make the best predictions we can for the patients we see today. That is our responsibility as designers,” Pierson said. “But on a longer time frame, it’s also really important that, yes, we improve the quality of medical data. This is not an acceptable state of affairs – we need to fight a two front battle.”

Pierson is also an assistant professor of population health sciences at Weill Cornell Medical College.

Patricia Waldron is a writer for the Cornell Ann S. Bowers College of Computing and Information Science.


As Cornell Tech looks toward future development, it aims to go beyond simply reducing its environmental impact. By continuing to innovate and incorporate new sustainable technologies, the New York City campus is a model for how urban spaces can thrive in harmony with natural systems, serving as a living laboratory for sustainable development in one of the world’s most iconic cities.

Walking across the Cornell Tech campus in the fall, visitors are bound to notice leaves changing color and Manhattan’s dramatic skyline rising across the East River, sights that have become the signature of the Roosevelt Island campus. Less apparent but just as much a part of Cornell Tech is the cutting-edge sustainable design woven into campus infrastructure. From thoughtful landscaping choices to high-tech energy saving techniques, sustainability is not just an extra at Cornell Tech – it’s what makes the campus run.

“When you see the campus without knowing the entire story, it’s easy to have no idea what’s going on under the surface,” said Biyoung Heo, Landscape Architect, from the firm Field Operations, which led the master landscaping planning and design for the campus. “It’s only when you get to talking about all of the innovations does the full picture of sustainability on campus become clearer and the entire vision starts to make sense. Everything from the recycled water to the bioswales are intentional and help make the campus incredibly environmentally friendly.”

Looking deeper into the campus’s innovative design features, such as the Emma and Georgina Bloomberg Center’s photovoltaic roof and rainwater collection system, it’s clear that efficiency, adaptive reuse of resources, and environmental stewardship are integrated into every aspect of the infrastructure. LEED certifications adorn buildings across the campus, best exemplified by “The House at Cornell Tech”, which, when it was unveiled in 2017, was the tallest and largest residential building built to Passive House standards – which requires reducing heating and cooling energy consumption by more than 75% compared to average new construction – in the world.

Underneath a long picnic bench area adjacent to the Bloomberg Center sits a 40,000-gallon rainwater collection tank. But this system does double duty: once water is collected, it is then cleaned and used in the Bloomberg Center’s refuse and nearby irrigation systems, reducing the need for municipal water sources. Additionally, the campus employs geo-exchange heating and cooling, an innovative and still uncommon system that drastically reduces annual energy consumption and cost, again, utilizing resources available right on the Island. In the colder months, the system through convection pulls warmth from the earth and, in warmer months, does the reverse.

While students, faculty and staff, as well as visitors and members of the Roosevelt Island community, interact with the campus every day, thoughtful, and oftentimes unnoticed details make a big difference when it comes to sustainability and resilience. The campus has been intentionally built several feet above sea level, which protects against flooding and also promotes intentional drainage. The small collections of flowers and shrubs on the perimeter of campus might be mistaken for decorative gardens, but are actually strategically placed and intentionally designed bioswales. The vegetated pathways act as natural filtration systems, capturing and cleaning stormwater runoff and holds it on site. , This reduces the rainwater impact on the city’s stormwater infrastructure while promoting biodiversity and natural filtration systems on campus.

The campus’s sustainable ethos extends to its material-sourcing practices as well. Rocks and stones used across the site, the porous pavement meant to assist with water draining and the strategically placed boulders, are sourced from a single quarry near Nyack, N.Y., reducing transportation-related energy and carbon use.

The commitment to sustainability doesn’t stop at infrastructure. Now, In addition to its technological advancements and infrastructure, Cornell Tech is working to embed sustainability as a core value in its campus culture. Through educational initiatives and local involvement from the Roosevelt Island Community, the campus is fostering a sense of shared responsibility for environmental stewardship among students, faculty, and the local community. As part of this effort, Andrew Fowler, Capital Project Manager at Cornell Tech, has also embraced a new and less formal position as a member of the institution’s sustainability committee. The committee, seeks to generate awareness and foster a culture of sustainability through initiatives within the campus community.

“We are all striving for continued improvement as our collective understanding of sustainability evolves,” said Fowler. “What this work really requires to be successful is to bring in more people to join our community. It is a process that requires everyone in order to change a culture.”


By Tom Fleischman

Nicola Dell, associate professor of information science at the Jacobs Technion-Cornell Institute at Cornell Tech, has been awarded a 2024 MacArthur Foundation fellowship for her work developing technology interventions to address the needs of overlooked populations, including home health care aides and survivors of intimate partner violence.

The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation announced the awards on Oct. 1. Each of this year’s recipients will receive a no-strings-attached award of $800,000 over five years – known as the “genius grant” – to use however they wish.

“It’s a huge vote of confidence in the work we do and in the importance of doing this kind of work,” said Dell, also a faculty member in the Cornell Ann S. Bowers College of Computing and Information Science. “And hopefully, it’s motivation to keep going and keep focusing on these kinds of topics and these communities.”

Novelist Ling Ma, MFA ’15, was also among the 2024 MacArthur recipients.

Dell’s research focuses on designing and building novel computing systems that improve the lives of underserved populations, including survivors of intimate partner violence (IPV) and home health care workers. She co-founded the Clinic to End Tech Abuse at Cornell Tech to translate her research into practice and support IPV survivors through one-on-one security consultations. Dell also advises tech companies about risks posed by frequently exploited products, and her research has informed legislation to ensure more robust protections against tech abuse.

“All of us at Cornell Tech congratulate Nicki Dell on this well-deserved honor,” said Greg Morrisett, the Jack and Rilla Neafsey Dean and Vice Provost of Cornell Tech. “By addressing the widespread issue of technology abuse, Nicki has dedicated her career to helping vulnerable communities. Nicki is an inspiration to her students, her colleagues and to the many victims and survivors of abuse whose lives she has touched. It brings us all great pride to learn that she has received this fellowship in recognition of her work’s transformative impact.”

Abusers often exploit technology to surveil, threaten, impersonate or harass their targets; Dell conducted qualitative studies of survivor experiences through a partnership with the New York City Mayor’s Office to End Domestic and Gender-Based Violence.

To investigate the tactics used by abusers, Dell and her collaborators also analyzed hundreds of posts in public online forums where potential perpetrators discuss strategies and spyware for surveilling their partners.

“We started out doing this sort of qualitative work to really just understand what people are experiencing,” Dell said. “Very quickly, the picture that emerged was devastating for survivors – that they were experiencing huge amounts of complex and persistent abuse, but really had nowhere to go.”

Exploring this problem exposed flaws in conventional security threat models, which are designed to guard against technologically sophisticated and distant adversaries, such as governments, and contributed new frameworks for security and privacy research to address closer, more personal types of threats.

“The analogy we draw is very much to things like health clinics, where if you have health problems, you can go and get help from a doctor, or if your car breaks down, you can go to a mechanic,” she said. “These survivors were trying to go to existing social services, or to law enforcement or to tech companies, and were really just getting no help.”

Dell also investigates how technology could improve patient outcomes and working conditions for home health care workers.

These essential caregivers are often among the most isolated and under-resourced workers in health care. Dell, director of technological innovation for the Initiative on Home Care Work, and her group explore the benefits of computer-mediated peer support programs, technologies to better integrate home health aides in the health care team and access to electronic training resources.

“There’s a huge need to try and improve the working conditions for these workers,” she said, “so that we can treat them with the respect and recognition they deserve, attract more people to the profession and, ultimately, make sure that folks are getting the care that they need to be able to age at home.”

A member of the Cornell Tech faculty since 2016, Dell is also a faculty affiliate of the Center for Applied Research on Work in the ILR School. Dell was the recipient of a 2018 National Science Foundation Faculty Early-Career Development Award and a 2023 SIGCHI Societal Impact Award.

Born in Zimbabwe, Dell received her bachelor’s in computer science from the University of East Anglia in Norwich, England, in 2004. She received her master’s (2011) and Ph.D. (2015) from the University of Washington.

Ma, who has taught creative writing and English at Cornell and at the University of Chicago, is the author of “Severance” (2018), an “apocalyptic office novel,” as she called it, about a pandemic in 2018 that eerily foreshadowed how the COVID-19 pandemic would empty offices and depopulate campuses.

She is also the author of 2022’s “Bliss Montage,” a collection of stories that blur genre distinctions and explore characters’ attempts to understand and be understood by others.

Ma received her bachelor’s in 2005 from the University of Chicago, where she will rejoin the faculty in 2025 as an associate professor in the Department of English Language and Literature.

Other Cornell professors to have won MacArthur Foundation fellowships include Deborah Estrin, computer science, Cornell Tech (2018); Will Dichtel, chemistry and biochemistry (2015); Craig Fennie, applied and engineering physics (2013); Jon Kleinberg, computer science (2005) and Paul Ginsparg, physics and computer science (2002).

Additionally, plant geneticist Barbara McClintock, Class of 1923, M.A. ’25, Ph.D. ’27, was named a MacArthur Fellow in 1981, the first year of the grants.

Tom Fleischman is a writer for the Cornell Chronicle.


Thomas Ristenpart, a Professor at Cornell Tech and in the Computer Science Department at Cornell University, received the esteemed Test of Time Award at the 33rd USENIX Security Symposium. This accolade recognizes his co-authored 2014 paper, “Privacy in Pharmacogenetics: An End-to-End Case Study of Personalized Warfarin Dosing,” for its enduring impact on the field over the past 10 years.

The Test of Time Award is reserved for papers that have significantly influenced their areas of research and must have been presented at their respective conference at least a decade prior. The USENIX Security Symposium serves as one of the most prestigious academic venues for research on the latest advancements in the security and privacy of computer systems and networks.

“We are incredibly proud of Professor Ristenpart’s contributions and the long-term impact he has made,” shared Dean Greg Morrisett, the Jack and Rilla Neafsey Dean and Vice Provost of Cornell Tech. “This award is a testament to Cornell Tech’s commitment to pioneering research that addresses critical challenges in our society and to the distinguished scholars who make up our faculty.”

The paper, which appeared at USENIX Security 2014, was written by Ristenpart in 2014 alongside co-authors Matthew Fredrikson from Carnegie Mellon University, Eric Lantz, Somesh Jha, and David Page from the University of Wisconsin, and Simon Lin from the Marshfield Clinic Research Foundation. It received the Best Paper Award that year.

“It’s really quite an honor that this paper won the Test of Time Award,” says Ristenpart. “I think it’s a testament to how important it is to understand privacy in machine learning, even more so now when we see explosive growth in use of it due to generative AI.”

In the paper, the team explores privacy concerns in pharmacogenetics, which uses machine learning to tailor medical treatments based on a patient’s genetic makeup. The paper specifically examines warfarin dosing — a critical medication for preventing blood clots — revealing how one can use a model for unintended purposes via what they termed “model inversion.” In particular, it shows experimentally that certain predictive models could be used to help predict a patient’s genetic information given their demographic data, especially for those people whose data was used in training the machine learning model in the first place.

To mitigate these risks, they tested differential privacy (DP), a method aimed at ensuring that models do not rely too heavily on an individual’s data. While DP can help prevent these attacks when applied carefully, it has drawbacks. Simulated clinical trials showed that using DP inappropriately could increase the risk of severe health issues like strokes and bleeding, threatening patient safety. The study concludes that future work would be required to understand the relationship between different kinds of privacy risks, countermeasures such as DP, and improvements to them. Subsequently, much follow-up research over the past decade has focused on addressing these specific issues.


By Tom Fleischman

How do online crowds form, grow and behave? How do they wield influence? What distinguishes desirable crowd activism from mob harassment?

In the summer of 2022, Cornell Tech and Cornell Law School professor James Grimmelmann and postdoctoral fellow Charles Duan hosted a virtual workshop in which participants attempted to answer these questions and more.

At the end of the two-day online workshop Grimmelmann, the Tessler Family Professor of Digital and Information Law at Cornell Tech and at Cornell Law School, and co-organizer Duan, now an assistant professor of law at American University’s Washington College of Law, asked participants to reflect on the conversations and identify important themes about platforms and crowds.

The result: “The Barons and the Mob: Essays on Centralized Platforms and Decentralized Crowds,” an introduction to the complexities of online crowds and the importance of understanding their nature in the context of efforts toward online platform regulation.

The introduction references a pair of online user “revolts.” In 2007, one of the users of news aggregator Digg posted an encryption key that could be used to circumvent copyright protection on Blu-Ray discs. Sixteen years later, Grimmelmann and Duan wrote, “history rhymed with itself” when Reddit, in preparation for a rumored IPO, started charging developers to access its previously free application programming interface. Users of both platforms rose up in revolt. In Digg’s case, the crowd won the revolt – not so with Reddit.

“The Digg disruption and the Reddit rebellion,” they wrote, “demonstrate the conflict between the two great sources of power on the Internet: the centralized platforms that control the infrastructure of online communities, and the decentralized crowds of users who come together in them.”

In all, a dozen experts share their perspectives in “The Barons and the Mob,” tackling what makes an online crowd; the influence of money on crowds; identifying misinformation; authenticity; network economics and other topics.

Grimmelmann spoke with the Chronicle about the essay collection:

Question: What was the impetus behind the workshop?

Answer: The idea came out of seeing some of the ways that crowds were self-consciously being weaponized for political and commercial purposes. The “to the moon” sentiment of the wallstreetbets subreddit wasn’t all that different from the kind of online energy associated with political movements or with influencer beefs. But platforms seemed to consider some of these crowds to be serious problems they had to block, and some of them to be benign intended uses. That paradox led us to look more closely at how platforms and crowds related to each other.

Q: Are there other moments in history that radically changed the dynamic between the “barons” and the “mob” – perhaps the invention of the printing press?

A: The printing press definitely helped catalyze new kinds of distributed groups, from scientific collaborations to journalism for “the public.” The age of revolution – starting especially with the French Revolution – demonstrated the dramatic power of the mob on the street compared with old aristocratic hierarchies. The mobs prevailed in the long run: Old forms of centralized power were swept aside and gave way to new political forms that were more responsive to mass public sentiment.

Q: Has the power dynamic between platforms and crowds morphed over time? Have crowds learned how to wield greater power over the last 20 to 30 years?

A: The Reddit moderator revolt last summer was a really striking moment, because Reddit explicitly decided that it was willing to take on the full power of a highly organized user group. It was a big bet, and Reddit basically won: Its IPO went ahead, and today the site has much more effective power over its user base. The pendulum seems to have swung in the direction of the platforms; they’re better able to predict and steer crowd dynamics than they were a few years ago.

You can see TikTok as an extreme example of this trend: The site harnesses crowd energy and enthusiasm but systematically works to prevent crowds from forming and sustaining themselves in ways that would form durable power alternatives.

Q: Do you see an ultimate “winner” in this push-and-pull between the “lords” (platforms) and the “commoners” (users)? Can there ever be a winner?

A: No – the tension is eternal. Without either of these forms, social media wouldn’t function. Platforms need crowds in order to be viable businesses, and crowds need platforms as a place to gather. They each have an interest in the other’s existence.

Q: Are there other big questions to be addressed in this space?

Yes – we don’t know how online crowds are catalyzed and controlled. We don’t know how to think about them as groups with agency for economic purposes. We don’t know what legitimate and effective forms of moderation to respond to them look like. We don’t know how regulations will go awry when crowds respond to them. And there are many more: This report is just a starting point, and a way of inviting people to think seriously about these issues.

Tom Fleischman is a Senior Writer/Editor for the Cornell Chronicle.


Cornell Tech today announced the newest cohort of 13 startup companies that will enter its established Runway incubator program this September. The program is run by the Jacobs Technion-Cornell Institute on the Cornell Tech campus and will welcome its largest cohort since the annual program began in 2014.

The 13 teams include eight Ph.D. founders, selected from 358 applications received this year for the Runway Startup Postdoc Program, and five “Spinout” teams, which are made up of 2024 Cornell Tech graduates who each won a $100,000 Start-Up Award at the conclusion of the 2023-2024 academic year.

Founders who participate in the program come from academic backgrounds and are focused on accelerating their young companies under the guidance of Cornell Tech faculty and advisors. To date, the program has launched more than 100 startups, including baby sleep monitor Nanit, real estate construction intelligence platform OnsiteIQ and infectious disease diagnostic Biotia. In total, the companies launched from the Runway Startups program have a valuation of more than $660 million and have created more than 500 new jobs in New York City.

Runway participants come to the Institute with early stage ideas and potential markets for their product(s). To help launch their startups and propel them into careers in the tech industry, they receive a package valued up to $325,000 for two years that includes a salary, a research budget, workspace on campus, and IP registration and use, as well as mentorship from academic and business experts in fields ranging from connective media, health technology, security and privacy, and computer vision.

“Runway is a proven catalyst for New York’s tech ecosystem. It creates entrepreneurship opportunities beyond those traditionally offered at universities and helps founders address the roots of real world issues and tackle them head on,” said Fernando Gómez-Baquero, Director of the Runway Startup Postdoc and the Spinout Programs at Cornell Tech. “The proposals from this year’s cohort have the potential to join alumni companies as they grow into fully realized startups, driving economic development, job growth, and New York’s leadership in innovation for years to come.”

Runway is part business school, part research institution, and part startup incubator. It helps tech founders translate their academic skills and mindset into entrepreneurial ventures. The incoming cohort plans to translate their ideas into startups utilizing tech, engineering and artificial intelligence, solving problems in fields ranging from healthcare to finance. The selected companies include:

  • Cipher, a marketplace that facilitates music licensing deals by connecting businesses to the biggest players of the music industry, tracking negotiations, and automating payments and licensing agreements.
  • Iriscience, integrating AR and VR into slit lamps, enabling remote eye examinations along with AI-assisted user interface to allow ophthalmologists and primary care providers to diagnose and treat patients in family clinics and underserved areas.
  • MercuryVote, a marketplace/auction house that provides a way for large and small retail investors to sell their unused and undervalued proxy votes for corporate elections, enabling activist investors to purchase the proxy votes to impact boards and proposals at the next corporate election.
  • MyophonX, a device consists of cutaneous electrodes embedded in a thin, flexible film, which capture Electromyography (EMG) signals from facial articulatory muscles. These signals are then processed by ANNs to produce speech, which can be transmitted via Bluetooth to an external device such as a phone, speaker, or headset and allow a person without a voice to speak.
  • mPulse-O2, a platform that enables accurate measurement of blood oxygen level and aims to transform the pulse oximetry technology by overcoming and changing the lack of inclusivity in design and validation of biomedical devices.
  • Onda Labs, addressing key challenges in water management, assisting utilities in boosting their revenue and improving overall efficiency by leveraging AI technologies.
  • Prendo, a digital platform for endometriosis that enables tracking patients’ symptoms individually on a daily basis and identifying the unique cyclic patterns and correlations of each symptom by generating “monthly symptom maps” and predicting the onset of symptoms.
  • PsyFlo, a platform that enables personalized, collaborative care for integrated behavioral health settings.
  • RapidReview, a platform that uses machine learning to accelerate research productivity by building tools that understand documents and help researchers navigate thousands of academic papers for literature review.
  • SensVita, a company that develops non-invasive sensors for wearable and furniture-integrated heart and lung monitoring by prioritizing no skin contact and broad application to clinical, at-home, and veterinary monitoring applications.
  • Simulacrum, an AI software venture that allows enterprises and institutions to make effective operational decisions in complex markets by providing them with behavioral market models learned from data to accurately predict future economic trends.
  • Vinci AI, a new ad format that combines the scale of interruptive ads and the engagement of in-video sponsored ads and that enables brands and creators to source sponsorship deals and automatically inserts brand advertisements into the background of creator videos.
  • WAVED Medical LLC, a medical software company developing technology that enhances breast cancer screening by using proprietary biophysical measurements that identifies pre-cancerous “at-risk” dense breast tissue most likely to progress to life-threatening disease.

Applications for the next cohort of Runway Startups, to begin in September 2025, will open on October 15, 2024 and close on February 15, 2025. For more information, go to https://tech.cornell.edu/programs/phd/startup-postdocs/